Microsoft/SCO versus Linux - Ultimate Conspiracy Theory

George Toft wrote:

>Remember about 20 years ago when Microsoft owned Xenix, developed by
>SCO? Then they transferred their interest back to SCO. Imagine if a
>Microsoft mole with advanced knowledge of the SCO kernel (and maybe the
>source code as well) were to contribute some of that code to the Linux
>kernel. A couple years later, SCO "finds" their code in the Linux
>kernel and files suit against the biggest player around. This would
>have a devastating effect on Linux in the corporate marketplace, which
>is precisely what Microsoft wants, and it paves the way for their
>"purebred, certified" code to fill the vacuum as thousands of companies
>dump Linux.
>
>Microsoft wins.
>
>Too far-fetched? Is it time for my medication?
>
>George
>
OMG George, I say that deserves a doobie.

--Alexander