\_ SMTP quoth Craig White on 3/14/2003 15:12 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 11:45, David A. Sinck wrote:
\_ >
\_ > \_ Of course, we could argue that the threading should just be done by date
\_ > \_ or by using the References and/or In-Reply-To headers instead.
\_ >
\_ > Yup. But lets just pretend we did that and I remained unconvinced to
\_ > change. :-)
\_ -----
\_ that's just one of the many things to love about Sinck...he's adaptable.
Yeah, when it suits me. Like when I was tripping a kibo filter on
purpose. :-)
Then again, look at the crocodilians and the sharkians.... why change
what works?
<flamebait>Could it be that so many looking for a job is a result of
not using the superior tool, emacs? :-)</flamebait>
<asbestos>David</asbestos>
(text/plain)