On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 2:21PM -0700, der.hans wrote:
> Am 04. Jan, 2003 schw=E4tzte Darrell Shandrow so:
>
> WEP is not sufficient. It shouldn't even be turned on.
But if it's the only solution at this point (for physical layer=20
security, anyway) why should it be turned off? I would figure that even=20
a little bit of encryption would be better than nothing.
> The replacement for WEP that's coming out is supposed to be=20
> sufficient.
Any idea where we can find info on this new replacement, and when it's=20
slated for release (if at all)?
--
Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
mondoshawan@tank.dyndns.org
http://tank.dyndns.org:8080
(text/plain)