/.journal ... whazzat?

You're right, it is a bad idea, but I didn't make myself very clear. Once=
the=20
journal has been created and is initialized, you won't be able to see it.=
=20
(Shouldn't be able to see it) So it seems to me as though that is just a=
=20
file taking up space.
If you have a knoppix cd handy, boot it, mount the drive, move that journ=
al,=20
then try to boot it, and see what happens. I would bet it works the same.=
If=20
it doesn't, you can boot back to knoppix and put the journal back.

I've converted many ext2 to ext3 while mounted and not mounted and have o=
nly=20
seen the journal while it is being created.. And it was on a RedHat machi=
ne=20
if I remember correctly.

I didn't so much mean you weren't running ext3 as I meant I really doubt =
it is=20
using that file.

nathan.

Am 21 Samstag, Dezember 2002 17:14 schrieb Lynn David Newton:
> ne> ... It sounds to me as if you are not really
> ne> running ext3.
>
> I'm quite sure it is.
>

>   ne>=09=09    When you machine boots up, does it
>   ne> give an error about not finding ext3 and mounting
>   ne> it as ext2?

>
> No, never has.
>
> ne> I may be totally wrong.
>
> ne> On the other hand, I bet if you deleted that file
> ne> (move it somewhere else, where you can retrieve
> ne> it later) everything will be okay. ...
>
> With all due respect, I think that sounds like a very
> bad idea. But thank you for the response.

- --=20
Nathan England

plug at the-arcanum.org
jabber id: linuxjunkie@jabber.earth.li

"A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular."
- --Adlai Stevenson


- -----------------------------------------------------------------

Registered Linux User #189789, Machine #106603
www.sincerechoice.org

Spam related material will be forwarded to:
uce@ftc.gov