Jeffrey Pyne wrote:
>
> Oh, but haven't you heard-- Windows 2000's TCO is lower than Linux'. IDC
> did an unbiased, Microsoft-sponsored study to prove it:
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,741748,00.asp. The study is chock full
> of hard-core research data like anecdotes, opinions and hearsay. I have
> already uninstalled Linux from all of my servers and installed
> fully-licensed copies of Windows 2000. I'm reaping the cost savings
> already! Thank goodness I read this research before it was too late!!
>
> ~Jeff
>
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:53 AM, Jim wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the logical approach is to inform the state IT
> > honchos that they can save a lot of money by at least
> > opening their eyes to things like Open Office, Linux,
> > etc. Certainly they should at least be willing to
> > listen to an intelligent, articulate presentation of
> > alternatives to MS software in light of the huge budget
> > deficits that the state is facing
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Here's my view:
http://www.georgetoft.com/thesis/results/index.shtml
It's a formal study: "Investigating the Effects of Organization Size,
Industry, and Workgroup Size on Workgroup Server Administration Time and
Downtime" and it wasn't sponsored by anyone.
George
--
This e-mail message certified virus-free
as it was generated on a Linux system.
http://www.georgetoft.com/linux/index.html
(text/plain)