Netstumbling and US Law

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: George Toft
Date:  
Subject: Netstumbling and US Law
Bill Nash wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Tony Wasson wrote:
>
> > I have heard Netstumbling defended as 'mapping local frequencies in use'. If
> > you are deploying your own wireless network, you'd want to make sure you do
> > not interfere with existing networks.
> >
>
>         That's a clever way of doing it. What happens when they ask why I
> was mapping frequencies on the other side of town? =)

>
> - billn
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



It's to make sure that it doesn't interfere with that tin can
directional antenna you set up:
http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/wlg/448

or the satellite dish:
http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/Airport/Primestar/Primestar.html

Yeah, that's the ticket!

George
-- 
              Irrefutable fact about projects: You can have 
                it Quick, Cheap, or Right - pick any two.
What does that tell you if your project is ahead of schedule and under
budget?