On Thursday 18 July 2002 03:19 pm, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> > With an open license, a project only needs to reach "critical mass" in
> > order
>
> Minor nit pick but an 'open' license doesnt prevent people from stealing
> things away. For sometime IBM gave source code to those that purchased
> their hardware/software, just as Microsoft gives source now to certain
> partners under its 'shared source' agreements.
All right. You got me. I guess I should have defined what I think of as an
"open license". Thanks for tearing apart my poorly worded (and
ill-planned) commentary. :-P
- --
Logan Kennelly
,,,
(. .)
- --ooO-(_)-Ooo--
(text/plain)