You appear to be in a minority here. The majority are adopting a different
approach.
1) No one qualified to provide a legal opinion has stated that it is illegal
for Maricopa County to source from Microsoft.
2) Assuming it *is* illegal to source from MS, the bureaucrats can simply
get MS product from resellers.
3) Assuming it is illegal and there is no legal way to evade the rule,
forcing the County to follow the rule will be counter-productive in terms of
both long-term relations with County IT and for PR.
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 08:57, you wrote:
> > Lets not forget the issue that brought the sunshine. According to the
> procurement procedures of Maricopa County, Microsoft can and should be
> debarred from competing for any county contracts because it has been
> convicted of federal antitrust violations.
>
> That is the point that needs to be made loudly and strongly. No matter how
> many shills MS wants to bring, no matter how much FUD and misinformation
> they want to spread, they cannot weasel their way around the letter of the
> county procurement procedures.
>
> - --
> Jim
>
> Freedom is worth protecting
>
> > ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)