I agree with Hans. We have the tools (i.e. the mail lists themselves) so why
not use them? Opt-in if you choose, do nothing (except take the time to read
the post) if you dont.
On Thursday 27 June 2002 16:13, you wrote: > Am 27. Jun, 2002 schwätzte Derek Neighbors so:
> > > SPAM, regardless of the cause, is *BAD*!!! We should not mass-email
> > > anyone.
> >
> > I disagree. Unsolicted SPAM is pure evil. Solicted SPAM is certainly
>
> If you've asked to receieve it, it isn't SPAM. That's why we can gently use
> the announce list ( something we should do more often ).
>
> If, OTOH, we just snarf all the email addies in our lists and start
> mass-mailing them, then that's SPAM. They've signed up for the list
> mechanisms. Using the email addies outside those contexts is opt-out.
>
> There's no need to hop outside the confines of the lists. People have
> signed up for those, let's use them. Let's not start direct emailing with
> addies reaped from the mailing lists.
>
> > acceptable. There are many companies I deal with that I request their
> > SPAM because its valuable to me (discounts, special events, promotions
> > etc) and I know they dont abuse me. Other people I do business with I
> > woudl never give them my information or if I did I certainly would opt in
> > for them to send me anything.
>
> We're mostly saying the same thing, except we're differing on the
> definition of SPAM.
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
(text/plain)