This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to
mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.
------_=_NextPart_000_01C208C1.78784FFA
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <
Pine.LNX.4.33.0205310944271.8026@pf.net.home>
So this is how you avoid complaints, misconfigure your Exchange server?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:37:36 -0600
From: System Administrator <
postmaster@qwest.com>
To:
pfleming@infomagic.net
Subject: Undeliverable: Cisco DoS required CBOS upgrade- Qwest complaint
Your message
To: support@qwest.com; mailmaster@cc.state.az.us; Phoenix Linux Users
Group; luna@infomagic.net
Subject: Cisco DoS required CBOS upgrade- Qwest complaint
Sent: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:40:21 -0600
did not reach the following recipient(s):
Support on Fri, 31 May 2002 10:54:33 -0600
The message could not be delivered because you do not have create
permissions on this folder or it is only available to folder owners at this
time
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
;p=qwest;l=DUBNTEX0110205311625KWK8BSW8
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Denver:QDENEX1
------_=_NextPart_000_01C208C1.78784FFA
Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <
Pine.LNX.4.33.0205310944272.8026@pf.net.home>
Content-Description:
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205310934420.8026-100000@pf.net.home>
From: Patrick Fleming EA <pfleming@infomagic.net>
To: support@qwest.com, mailmaster@cc.state.az.us,
Phoenix Linux Users Group <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>,
luna@infomagic.net
Subject: Cisco DoS required CBOS upgrade- Qwest complaint
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:40:21 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain
I have been in contact with Cisco support as well as customer support
within Qwest regarding a serious Denial of Service update to the software
that runs my Cisco 678 router. On 5-23-2002 Cisco released the following
advisory:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/CBOS-DoS.shtml As
indicated, I called Qwest- the provider of my modem. The first person I
talked to transfered me to another department. Without talking to anyone
at all, just following the prompts provided by the voice mail system, I
was able to get right back where I originally started, with DSL Tech
support. This time I was told that they had just received a memo regarding
the updated software but that he didn't know anything more regarding the
memo. This was either 5-28 or 5-29. I emailed Cisco, based upon their
press release to attempt to get the update from them as I was unsuccessful
with getting anything from Qwest. Their response is the following website:
http://www.qwest.com/dsl/customerservice/modemsupport.html which as of
9:00am 5-31-2002 indicated that they are working on getting the software
ready for use by their customers. This software has been available since
5-23 from Cisco, but since Qwest DSL users purchase their modems from
Qwest, Cisco indicates that it is Qwest's responsibility to provide the
upgrades. I would have no problem with that if Qwest fulfilled this
responsibility with their customers, of which I am only one. I have
recontacted Cisco in regards to the unavailability of the upgrade on
Qwest's site and I seem to be in a support loop waiting for a human to
read my email.
I believe that this deserves the attention of the Corporation Commission
as it represents a shortfall in the quality of service provided by a
public utility.
--
Patrick Fleming, EA
http://myhdvest.com/patrickfleming
Licensed to represent taxpayers
before Exam, Appeals, and Conference
divisions of the IRS
------_=_NextPart_000_01C208C1.78784FFA--
(text/plain)
