Thanks Geoerge, the hexdump is identical to the one you supplied,
as you can see from the following:
hexdump -xc for
0000000 2123 622f 6e69 622f 7361 0a68 6f66 2072
0000000 # ! / b i n / b a s h \n f o r
0000010 2069 6e69 6020 6573 2071 2031 3031 3b60
0000010 i i n ` s e q 1 1 0 ` ;
0000020 640a 0a6f 2020 2020 2020 2020 6365 6f68
0000020 \n d o \n e c h o
0000030 2420 0a69 6f64 656e 000a
0000030 $ i \n d o n e \n
Clay Stapleton
On Saturday 25 May 2002 07:45 am, George Toft wrote:
> Run hexdump on the script and post the results. The hexdump should look
> *exactly* like this:
> $ hexdump -xc test
> 0000000 2123 622f 6e69 622f 7361 0a68 6f66 2072
> 0000000 # ! / b i n / b a s h \n f o r
> 0000010 2069 6e69 6020 6573 2071 2031 3031 3b60
> 0000010 i i n ` s e q 1 1 0 ` ;
> 0000020 640a 0a6f 2020 2020 2020 2020 6365 6f68
> 0000020 \n d o \n e c h o
> 0000030 2420 0a69 6f64 656e 000a
> 0000030 $ i \n d o n e \n
> 0000039
>
>
> Or e-mail me the script.
>
> George
(text/plain)