+--------------+
| PLEASE |
| DO NOT FEED |
| THE TROLLS |
| --The Mgt.|
+------++------+
||
o o o || *
,,\|/,,,||,,,/,,,
---+--------------
On Fri, 24 May 2002, T wrote:
> ...at least, according to this article it seems to...
>
>
> http://www.worldtechtribune.com/worldtechtribune/asparticles/buzz/bz05222002
> .asp
>
>
> A May 2002 news story from News Corporations Australian IT website
> illustrates how the open source method of software development for Linux is
> vastly overrated for business customers. According to a story on May 21,
> 2002 titled "IT Workers poorly skilled: report" by Karen Deane Internet
> Business Systems chief executive David Brykman said he was shocked to find
> many candidates with university degrees and years of experience couldn't
> pass a simple skills test. The Melbourne-based company has been seeking
> Visual Basic and SQL programmers over the past six months to handle its
> business in industrial strength applications that run through a browser or
> over the web. In the past two months we've reviewed about 500 resumes, and
> out of those were lucky if we can distil one or two people who are what we
> would call qualified, he said.
>
> It is a grim statement on the state of software programming, but you might
> ask: What does this have to do with Linux and open source? Okay, think of
> it this way: What makes open source the secure, stable and elegant software
> panacea open source cultists claim it is? The Linux crowd point to the
> thousand eyes in the vast and benevolent Linux community that view the
> code and the ability to reuse this secure, stable and elegant code in
> numerous projects. These thousands of eyes are supposed to be able to spot
> weaknesses in the code and fix them immediately without bureaucratic hassles
> found in corporate software development.
>
> Because of the General Public License that virtually all Linux/open source
> apps are subject to, Linux/open source programmers are within legal rights
> to cut-and-paste pieces of code from any other open source app into their
> project. For example, say you are the IT director at a bank and you buy
> into the Linux is stable, secure and bulletproof hype. The banks CEO
> mandates that all loan officers to have a custom software package to track
> customer credit ratings. Your main applications programmer tells you that
> he knows a perfect piece of code he can use on SourceForge (an open source
> code clearinghouse website) that will drastically cut development time and
> costs. You can legally cut-and-paste this code into your credit software
> and supposedly make your system stable and secure.
>
> What do business people involved in software development think of this
> approach? David Brykman lamented that most software programmers have become
> lazy due to the prevalence of open source development methods.
> Unfortunately we find people try to look up existing code and then want to
> copy and paste it, rather than being able to do the task themselves.
> Brykman said. [P]eople still need those skills.
>
> The attack on Brykmans views from the Linux crowd will be: Hes working
> with Microsoft tools like Visual Basic that are inherently too closed
> because of Micro$ofts monopolistic bullying. If Brykman worked with open
> source tools, he wouldnt have this problem.
>
> Such an attack is pointless because it doesnt address the business aspects
> software development. If Brykman could use a
> free-as-in-beer/free-as-in-liberty piece of code to accomplish his
> business goals for almost no cost, he would. Brykman's business is creating
> browser-based Intranet software - Usually that business segment prides
> itself on being platform independent. Wouldn't Brykman prefer open source
> development methodologies due cross-platform nature and its ability to
> use/reuse code for free-as-in-beer/free-as-in-liberty? Linux cultists are
> so fond of saying theres nothing in the GPL keeping businesses from
> charging for code (a semantic gymnastic feat to prove to anyone with half a
> brain), so why wouldnt Brykman welcome programmers whose method is to
> cut-and-paste snippets of open source code?
>
> No, the problem is that even these supposedly skilled programmers who hack
> couldnt get a functioning application out of the millions of lines of code
> floating out on the Internet. If they could, Brykman wouldnt be
> complaining about the lack of programming skills found amongst most job
> applicants.
>
> Businesses in the post dot-com-bomb era will need real programmers, not
> spoiled lazy kids stealing from true geniuses. The Microsoft .Net framework
> is poised to be the formidable computing platform in the next few years;
> mainly due to the innovation required in the C# programming community and
> their commitment to intellectual property rights. The Java cross-platform
> programming language has been around for almost a decade and Sun has never
> been able to work it into their the computer is the network and the network
> is the computer strategy. Maybe its because so much Java code is used and
> reused? JBoss anyone? Does IBMs Jikes ring any bells? Notice all the
> Java code on SourceForge? See the press releases from Sun trumpeting their
> alliance with Apache to make the Java platform even more open?
>
> Welcome to the lazy, cut-and-paste world of open source innovation where
> people who should be smart enough to know better still think you can get
> something for nothing. It would be humorous if it wasn't so pathetic...
> Email me with your opinion
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
(text/plain)