On Tue, 21 May 2002, Bill Nash wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002, Nick Estes wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > learn Ruby.
> >
>
> I don't deny that Ruby may be a good alternative, but that's surely the
> worst possible recommendation one could muster. Not so much that you
> suggest Ruby, but that you do it without any quantification of *why* Ruby
> is a good alternative to Perl. You may as well slap an orange from a
> child's hand and tell him to play with fire instead, without explanation.
A more detailed explaination was required for my answering the wrong
question? How absurd! Now go play with fire. (-=
--Nick