CBDTA

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jim
Date:  
Subject: CBDTA
This is dangerous not only because the real intent of the Act is couched in a
misleading title, but because it protects companies who choose not to protect
themselves and forces technology companies to pay for it, thereby not only
costing technology users more but also restricting the rights of every honest
technology user.

If the technology exists for protecting digital content , why havent the
copyright owners invested in it? Why do they need to be protected by the
government? Why do electronic consumers and technology companies need to pay
for the security and protection that the digital content copyright owners
refuse to pay for?

JMHO
- --
Jim

Freedom is worth preserving