iptables (was port forwading)

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Carl Parrish
Date:  
Subject: iptables (was port forwading)
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 20:00, David A. Sinck wrote:
>
>
> The biggest thing is that the chains are named slightly differently
>
> input (ipchains) vs INPUT (iptables)
>
> which I occassionally still overlook until it coughs on me.


Yeah I wasn't expecting the order of options to matter either but it
seems that -d has to happen before -p in iptables (I'm pretty sure it
didn't matter in ipchains). oh well I'm going to see if I can figure it
all out tonight if not its going to have to wait for awhile.

Carl P.