Cox and E-smith

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Mike Butash
Date:  
Subject: Cox and E-smith
    Could be worse, comcast actually hunts down people running hosts behind a
natbox of whatever form as they want you to buy their "premium" service. I
guess they look for *abnormal* amounts of concurrent tcp sessions or
something, but im not really positive. Victor is right though, @home (now
cox hsi) has always charged for additional ip address allocations with a max
of 5, nothing new.

-mbutash

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Victor
Odhner
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:49 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Cox and E-smith


Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> I was really surprised to learn Cox is charging $6.95
> to have a second box on line.


That's been the case for the two years since
I started Cox@Home. If you have multiple IPs
visible to the cable, then Cox charges you
$6.95 for the extra ones -- I think they allow
a total of three IPs. Of course if you use
NAT then they don't see the difference,

Vic
________________________________________________
See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post
to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.

PLUG-discuss mailing list -
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss