anti dot-net spew

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David A. Sinck
Date:  
Subject: anti dot-net spew

\_ SMTP quoth Joseph Gledhill on 3/4/2002 09:12 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ I need some legitimate reasons not to go with .NET as a development
\_ platform. Any comments would be appreciated.

My guess is that you'll need to express this in terms a manager can
understand: the bottom line.

Try:
    
    IF we do this then we face:

    
    * maintenace costs (more/less/same) than norm
    * retraining costs (</>/=) than norm
    * client compatability costs ....

    

You won't 'win an argument' with a manager on technical grounds of
'coolness' or 'developed by the redmondites'. If you can't make it
seem reasonable to a manager based on the bottom line, my guess is
that it's time to learn .NET.

YMMV.

David