Tom Achtenberg wrote:
>
> Good luck with this. I've tried twice and had so many dependencies that
> could not be resolved I gave up. These went about 4 layers deep and the rpm
> they supplied were the wrong versions. I was lurking on their discussion
> (Ximian) and it sounded like Evolution and Ximian are a 50/50 gamble on RH.
> People either loved it or cursed it. Seemed that most who loved had
> xamian.org in their email address. To be fair, my boss is running it on
> RH7.2 and loves it. I'm going to wait for KDE 3 which went into beta
> testing a little over a month ago.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carl Parrish" <cparrish@home.com>
> To: <bltnewuser@topica.com>; <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:36 AM
> Subject: Evolution 1.0
>
> Okay I'm tring to upgrade to Evolution 1.0 got the tar ball but while
> trying to configure it I get an error saying my db.h version isn't high
> enough. So I went to rpmfind.com to try to find a more recent version.
> (That's what I do with .so files) doesn't seem to know what I'm talking
> about. Any suggestions on how I can get a more to date version of db.h?
> btw I'm running RH 7.2
>
-----
This is a tough one - suggest that you go to gnomehide @ redhat or one
of its mirrors and and get the rpm's and there will be some dependents
that you have to install but at least, you will be able to install on
top of your existing gnome setup.
Craig
(text/plain)