I love the comment about the hostname on IRC. It's true. I had to ask
someone that was using @home about their host being IP's. I love the tech
that couldn't figure out what DNS was. But that's typical of a large
company that just hires someone to be a butt in a chair. That's all they
care about and will ever care about. As long as they are taking money from
someone, they don't care what they provide them that works.
Kimi
At 11/28/01, you wrote:
>Ahh.. @Home.. Gotta love them. I just actually got there service in my
>house about a month ago, I asked the technician that came out to my house
>about the whole home.com bankrupty and this is what he told me (who knows if
>it's true, he's just a idiot that works for cox@)
>
>Excite@Home went bankrupt, and so they sold it to ATT (I believe) and ATT
>wasn't doing good either, so what cox did was they bought part of there
>service from @home, and they made there own cable service. It is now called
>SP@Home.
>
>So, I asked what is the difference between SP@home? They said nothing!
>Execpt Cox@ owns it, instead of @Home. Even though I have home.com email
>addresses still but who knows.
>
>The only big difference from cox@home and sp@home which I hate is, that you
>don't have to change your computer name to cx23815901385 or anything anymore.
>
>You no longer get a static ip either, it's true DHCP, if you log off your
>machine for a few hours, you will have a new ip in the morning. Which
>bugged the crap out of me, so I just went and bought a router, have had the
>same ip for 3 weeks now ;-)
>
>I asked why they changed to DHCP, and they told me because cox@ only bought a
>certain amount of ips from home.com, and they don't have enough ips to give
>everyone a static ip anymore.
>
>Another disadvantage of sp@home is for the IRC users. They make it so your
>ip will resolve to some hostname, but that hostname doesnt resolve.
>
>So, when your on IRC, you won't have a hostname anymore, it will all by IPs,
>which suck for access lists and such if you use them by hostnames.
>
>I called Cox@ and asked them whats up with that, and they couldn't come up
>with a answer for me. One guy even asked me what DNS was.
>
>But the speeds between sp@home and cox@home are no different. I can't
>notice a difference. The guy also said that cox was converting all of there
>customers to sp@home within a few months. Who knows?
>
>Tyler Hall
>
>
>On Wednesday 28 November 2001 01:41 pm, you wrote:
> > Check out this article. The @home service may be shutting down on Friday.
> >
> > http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/breaking/1128NET-TECH-EXCITEHOME-DC.
> >html
> >
> > Tom Achtenberg
> > Database Administrator/Developer
> > Food for the Hungry/US
> > 7729 E Greenway Rd
> > Scottsdale, AZ 85260
> > (480) 609-7750 (voice)
> > (480) 443-1420 (fax)
> > Tom.Achtenberg@FH.org
> >
> > Find out what YOU can do to help the hungry at
> > http://www.fh.org
> > http://www.eSponsorship.org
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> > post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>________________________________________________
>See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
>post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
>PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
>http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)