Woohoo!!!

I work for a small retailer and run a mixed environment. Red Hat and win 98
we also have an NT server. I believe that the servers, yes both, have been
up and running for more than 7 months each. No problems with either OS
except their inherent deficentcies. Lack of applications on Linux and
Viruses on Windows.

Charles Reynolds
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kimi A. Adams" <kimi@unitywave.com>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Woohoo!!!


> Well, well. Now it just seems like someone's joy is someone's thorn. I
> believe that having a Windows machine up more than three days is a feat
> beyond having a Linux server up a whole year. But then again, I also get
a
> warm fuzzy when my machine doesn't perform some type of screw up on a
daily
> basis. Those .dll files can be quite a pain in the neck. So, I would
like
> to put this into perspective. If you have a server that hasn't crashed or
> stopped working or been accidentally reformatted at least once, then I
> congratulate you with my whole heart and being. But, on Windows, whether
> it needs it or not, we start from scratch every few months. No
> notification needed, definitely no crying required. But then again,
> notifications can be quite a preempt to a larger problem at hand. Wishing
> well to those that have made it more than three days............
>
> : )
>
> Kimi
>
> At 11/21/01, you wrote:
> >Wooho? Would you (if you could) set up a 'at' command to
> >do something like this:
> >'uptime | mail -s "See how well we are doing!" cfo@yourcompany.com'
> >
> >Doesn't look so impressive at that point does it? :-)
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > Digital Wokan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I didn't think Windows had an uptime command. (If they did, it was
> > > > apparently so shamefully low, they removed it from Win2K.)
> > > >
> > > > George Toft wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I am not bashing Microsoft, but in a fit of glory, I must share
> > > > >my elation. I have nursed my Windows box along to record heights
> > > > >in uptime:
> > > > >
> > > > >=============================================================
> > > > >Microsoft(R) Windows 98
> > > > > (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.
> > > > >
> > > > >C:\WINDOWS>uptime
> > > > > 00:41:07 up 6 days, 5:17, 1 user
> > > > >C:\WINDOWS>
> > > > >=============================================================
> > > > >
> > > ----------
> > > I get very good uptimes from Windows NT 4.0 / SP6a - so that is not a
> > > big deal - Windows 98 isn't very impressive.
> > >
> > > There is a Micosoft Windows Diagnostic Tool on Win98SE that will
report
> > > these things like uptime.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > > ________________________________________________
> > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail
doesn't
> > post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > >
> > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >________________________________________________
> >See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> >post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> >PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> >http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss