Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose

Attachments:
Message as email (text/plain)

Author: Leonard, Robert B Mr EACH
Date:
Subject: Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C16A6D.41F1CDF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"

I was a conslutant at Motorola's Flat Panel, before it became a tax write
off. It was KevinO and I that started using linux at that facility,
starting with programs that made management make firework sounds, "oooooh"
"ahhhhh" with flashing bright lights. Namely some network monitoring apps,
that left openview in the dust. It's the only group i regret not leaving
consulting and joining full time.

I could care less about the MS/Linux battles, I like using linux, and i hate
to see skewed stories/statistics when the OS speaks for itself.

The only thing that amazon has in common with opensource companies is that
it loses money too. The fact that thier using linux vs. proprietary Unix's
is a insanely cool, but don't infer that it's at M$ expense, let the OS
stand on it's merits and not on misleading statements.

Leave the BS to the professional BS'rs

"The reason that you see open source there at all is because we came in and
said there should be a platform that's identical with millions and millions
of machines, and the BIOS of that should be open to everybody to use, and
all the extensibility should be there." Bill at last MS shareholder
meeting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Parrish
To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Sent: 11/10/01 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose

George Toft wrote:

> Hi Carl,
>
> My Thesis was on the TCO for different workgroup servers. For
> servers, Linux is a no-brainer, if you have a competent admin.
> For desktops, the link that Robert Leonard posted supports my
> position quite well (thanks Robert).
>
> George
>
>

Thanks for making that clear George. Despite my post I still had a knee
jerk reaction to defend Linux. Thanks for the Link Robert I haven't had
a chance to read it yet but will soon do so. BTW Robert did you use to
work with ITSS at Motorola?

Carl P.

________________________________________________
See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.

PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

------_=_NextPart_001_01C16A6D.41F1CDF0
Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will lose</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

I was a conslutant at Motorola's Flat Panel, before =
it became a tax write off.  It was KevinO and I that started using =
linux at that facility, starting with programs that made management =
make firework sounds, "oooooh" "ahhhhh" with =
flashing bright lights.  Namely some network monitoring apps, that =
left openview in the dust.  It's the only group i regret not =
leaving consulting and joining full time.

I could care less about the MS/Linux battles, I like =
using linux, and i hate to see skewed stories/statistics when the OS =
speaks for itself.  

The only thing that amazon has in common with =
opensource companies is that it loses money too.  The fact that =
thier using linux vs. proprietary Unix's is a insanely cool, but don't =
infer that it's at M$ expense, let the OS stand on it's merits and not =
on misleading statements.

Leave the BS to the professional BS'rs


"The reason that you see open source there at =
all is because we came in and said there should be a platform that's =
identical with millions and millions of machines, and the BIOS of that =
should be open to everybody to use, and all the extensibility should be =
there."  Bill at last MS shareholder meeting.
 

-----Original Message-----
 From: Carl Parrish
 To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
 Sent: 11/10/01 9:08 PM
 Subject: Re: Why Linux will win and Micro$oft will =
lose


George Toft wrote:


> Hi Carl,
 > 
 > My Thesis was on the TCO for different =
workgroup servers.  For 
 > servers, Linux is a no-brainer, if you have a =
competent admin.  
 > For desktops, the link that Robert Leonard =
posted supports my 
 > position quite well (thanks Robert).
 > 
 > George
 > 
 > 


Thanks for making that clear George. Despite my post =
I still had a knee 
 jerk reaction to defend Linux. Thanks for the Link =
Robert I haven't had 
 a chance to read it yet but will soon do so. BTW =
Robert did you use to 
 work with ITSS at Motorola?


Carl P.


________________________________________________
 See <A =
HREF=3D"http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml</A> if =
your mail doesn't
 post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to =
write mail.


PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  =
PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
 <A =
HREF=3D"http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-=
discuss</A>


</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C16A6D.41F1CDF0--

This message is part of the following thread:
	the complete thread tree sorted by date
	Carl Parrish at
	Nancy Sollars at