Am 30. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Brian Cluff so:
> There is an article over at slashdot about the w3c considering the use of
> patented technologies in future protocols.
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/30/1454216&mode=thread
>
> Looks like this is the last day to get in any comments on the proposed
> plan, so if you value being able to use konqueror, mozilla or any other
> browser that can't afford to pay a license fee to be able to browse future
> web pages.
>
> Please see the article on the link above for details and places to send
> comments.
After hitting LinuxToday and slashdot the proprosal got over 700 messages
today. They got less than 100 in the two weeks prior to that. Goes to show
that we can respond when necessary. It might also show that we don't have a
life if we can drum up that much on a Sunday :). I was even lamer because I
was working and didn't get time to do anything during the day even though I
knew about it :(.
It's not over. Maybe the dramatic response will actually get them to
reconsider trying to slide it through without giving opportunity for true
public feedback. If so, we need to have real critiques and examples to offer
up.
Check posts from:
Alan Cox
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0131.html
Jeremy Allison
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0033.html
Kevin O'Conner
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0591.html
EBo
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0700.html
George Toft
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0540.html
Though he wrote a good response, George unfortunately missed a grand
opportunity to mention both Anthem and Rand in the same message ;-).
Granted, Ayn Rand seemed to be into keeping things from the public and only
making them available to those who were good enough to understand their
value.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0746.html
Adam Warner posted that message he received from Janet Daly of the W3C in
response to the deluge of responses today. She points out that they need
concrete critiques. Unfortunately time was a little short to read and
comprehend the whole thing.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Sep/0750.html
Branden Robinson got in a point about the amount of response in such a short
time.
After the buzzer, according to the W3C archive, we have posts from:
Bruce Perens
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/0027.html
rms ( written from Flagstaff :)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/0018.html
and a good email from Karsten M. Self about the response and extending the
time for public comment. He mentions reasons why it seems the W3C didn't
advertise this proposal very well. We need to remind our community, though,
that we have to be vigilent and find these types of things on our own as
well.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/0025.html
ciao,
der.hans
--
#
der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/
www.DevelopOnline.com
# C'est la Net - der.hans
(text/plain)