Am 16. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Eric so:
> If know some Web page that gets specific about that, I would like to see it.
I got most of it from reading the indictment. Granted, that caused half of
my brain to go into a coma and the other half to spasm, so I might've read
it wrong or completely missed important parts.
I have also read numerous articles, so it's quite possible that I was swayed
by the mass media :(.
> I just did a fact check after reading your email and the indictment
> indicates Skl. and Elc. are both being charged with conspiracy and
> trafficking. It is the latter charge that violates the DMCA. So apparently
> is not the coding he is being charged with, nor is it the talk he gave in
> Las Vegas that got him busted. Still, persons are not typically liable for
> the actions of corporations unless such persons were in control of the
> corporation.
Would him being listed as the one in charge of the .us operation count?
Methinks it would.
> > That's why Skylarov was charged. Elcomsoft setup co-lo or something within
> > the continental .us for sales within the .us. Skylarov was listed on the
> > paperwork as the person in charge of that operation.
>
> Could you point me to that paperwork, cuz I don't see it in the indictment?
It was in the initial blitz. Don't remember the source. I'll see if I can
find it.
Thought I saw reference to it in the indictment in the testimony from the
FBI agent.
ciao,
der.hans
--
#
der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/
www.DevelopOnline.com
# It's up to the reader to make the book interesting.
# An author has only the opportunity to make it uninteresting. - der.hans
(text/plain)