Redhat choosing Ext3fs for RH7.2

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nathan England
Date:  
Subject: Redhat choosing Ext3fs for RH7.2
As long as your kernel supports it, build the kernel and then run
tune2fs -j and that will create the journal.. If it's mounted it will
still work, you'll just get a cool .journal file while it's doing it.
Once it runs, took about 5 seconds, then change fstab to match ext3 and
reboot. That's all.

Be sure and test tune2fs and make sure it has the -j option, if it
doesn't you'll have to update your ext2utils.

nathan


On 24 Aug 2001 08:13:18 -0700, foodog wrote:
> Nathan, where'd you find docs on upgrading to ext3 (or how'd you do
> it)? I have Roswell running and would like to give it a try. Thanks,
> Steve
>
> Nathan England wrote:
> >
> > I have a 15gb partition with ext2 and after I read that article I tried
> > to upgrade to ext3. It is very painless, and seems to work flawlessly.
> > I myself only use reiserfs, but I thought it worth an attempt.
> >
> > I have compiled 7 kernels and other stuff, while running a heavy
> > database on the system, and just hit the powerswitch about 9 times, and
> > it comes back each time. The longest its's taken so far to read the
> > journal and update is (to my best sense) about .5 a second.. So it's
> > pretty good. I'm not running a system like that, but it's a PIII 660E
> > with 384 mb ram, so it's almost close!!! but slack 8 on it, and a web
> > server, mysql, ldap, smb, and a few other databases... sap, a test
> > version of oracle, db3. And I've been beating the hell out of it since
> > then. It's working for me!!!
> >
> > Still like Reiser though, but that's cuz I'm used to it, tried and true.
> > But in an environment where I couldn't wipe the drive and start over, or
> > a back up would be too much, ext3 was as easy as it gets to upgrade to.
> >
> > nathan
> >
> > On 23 Aug 2001 21:37:08 -0700, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > > I caught this link on Slashdot the other day and (not to start a flame war) was
> > > wondering what people thought of ext3fs for large drives.
> > >
> > > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-08-22-004-20-NW-RH
> > >
> > > The reason I'm asking is that my company is looking to get a new server with 4
> > > 73GB Ultra3 SCSI drives. This will be a replacement/add-on server in the server
> > > room running Linux as a database/web machine. We have a Quad PII450 Xeon
> > > running RH6.2 and it can take quite a long time to fsck the 60GB of current
> > > space that it has when it boots up from something bad (Can't recall this ever
> > > happening while I've been there).
> > > ________________________________________________
> > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > >
> > > PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss