Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4

--4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you can, try burning those CDs with a different burning program that's
designed for burning ISO images to CD. CD Creator is not exactly a great
choice for burning ISO images, and will often crash or mis-write informatio=
n.
(At least, that's what's happened to me on virtually every system I've tried
it on with an HP CD-Writer 7200 -- YMMV)

--=20
Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
http://tank.dyndns.org/presence

On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:57:47AM -0700, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> I'm using CD Creator 4.0 and telling it the file type is ISO. They are
> about 670MB
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Thomas
> Mondoshawan Tate
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:14 PM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4
>=20
>=20
> How big are the ISO images?
> How are you attempting to burn the CDs?
>=20
> --
> Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
> phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
> http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
>=20
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:26:44PM -0700, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> > Simple for me, I have not been able to get ANY of the newer releases to
> > install. Seems I'm stuck with RH 7.0 I've tried RH 7.1 and Mandrake 8=
.0
> > and both repeatedly bomb out on the install. I've redownloaded the fil=
es
> > for both, but have not been able to successfully make a bootable CD from
> an
> > ISO file.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Mondoshawan Tate
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:58 PM
> > To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > Subject: Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4
> >
> >
> > Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching the
> > older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while --
> didn't
> > say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or something. Isn't =
the
> > existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2.3 kernels h=
ave
> > reached a stable version?
> >
> > --
> > Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
> > phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
> > http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> >
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>=20
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't p=
ost to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>=20
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

--4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7fU59Yp5mUsPGjjwRAmHJAJ0QWN8Dg9SOPCVN3XFJriMNHkQW7ACfd1lp
MQaShiwGlX2JtXo7ZjSW15g=
=PVY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5--