Hi Rick,
With one big partition, you have to back up and restore if you change
Linux distros or reinstall from scratch. With a separate /usr/local
and /home partitions, you can maintain your software installed and
change the distro and everything still works. I did this as I switched
from Red Hat to Caldera to Debian to SuSE, which requires reformatting
the partitions.
Also, maintaining a separate /var partition shields you against some
hardlink security risk (the name of which I cannot remember).
George
Rick Rosinski wrote:
>
> A long time back, I thought I was ingenius by creating separate partitions,
> 650 mb each so that I can back them up to cd rom, thinking that I could
> manage them better. But, I keep running out of space on each partition,
> having to make symlinks to directories that I copied to partitions with space
> to spare. I am thinking about discarding this whole approach, and to just
> use one single partition for all programs, and to keep all data on a separate
> large partition. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using huge
> partitions as apposed to having them broken down into smaller partitions?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Rick Rosinski
> http://rickrosinski.com
> rick@rickrosinski.com
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)