> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of
> plug@arcticmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:29 PM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: virtual memory swap size
>
>
>
> > If you have 128Mb RAM what would be the optimal size to make the swap
> > partition?
>
>
> 513M of swap.
>
> A) Disk is cheap.
> B) The day you start hitting swap, you'll double
> your RAM to 256M, so at that point in time
> your swap will be 2x RAM, which is generally
> a good rule.
> C) The day you start hitting swap with the 256M
> configuration, you'll double your RAM to
> 512M, so at that point in time your swap
> will be RAM + 1M.
> D) DISK IS CHEAP.
>
> So in conclusion, 1025M of swap for 128M of RAM.
>
>
Did I get you right...disks are cheap? I like the extra megabyte on each, it
also encompasses Sinck's technical SFF (server fudge factor).
;-)
got it.
Craig
(text/plain)