On Apr 27, 2:16pm, Jiva DeVoe wrote:
> > It is being worked on, off and on. It really helps when we (the
> > GDB team) have relatively small test cases to look at.
>
> I'll see if I can come up with some.
Good. I think that is the only way we'll make progress on this
matter...
> > BTW, this discussion probably ought to be moved to
> > gdb@sources.redhat.com. I'm willing to continue discussing it here if
> > you want, but you'll get the attention of other GDB developers if you
> > ask your question on one of the GDB mailing lists. (The Linux threads
> > maintainer for GDB is usually pretty responsive if you supply him with
> > specific test cases.)
> >
>
> Yeah, I posted to the gdb list at the same time I posted here. Have
> only gotten a few responses from (I assume) non-maintainers so far,
> and it's been recommendations for other products to use.
I waited a bit for other maintainers to respond. The only thing that
I can say about the matter is that I'm not seeing the problems that
you're seeing, but, OTOH, I almost never use the released gdb-5.0.
(Nor do most of the other maintainers.)
I sent a reply to your gdb@sourceware message a few moments ago. You
(Jiva) should get a copy in your mailbox. Others who are following
this discussion can see it at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-04/msg00244.html
Kevin
(text/plain)