[Xpert]XFree86 4.0.3 with Voodoo3 2000 and Virtual Resoluito…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Rick Rosinski
Date:  
Subject: [Xpert]XFree86 4.0.3 with Voodoo3 2000 and Virtual Resoluitons
I am absolutely sure that this came from /etc/X11.
Would Glide have anything to do with this, along side with the nvidia
driver?
If so, where can I get the latest Glide drivers (besides looking in
www.3dfx.com (it doesn't have it, or ftp.3dfx.com - which doesn't exist)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Vojkovich <>
To: <>
Date: Monday, April 02, 2001 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Xpert]XFree86 4.0.3 with Voodoo3 2000 and Virtual Resoluitons


>On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Rick Rosinski wrote:
>
>> I looked at the XFree86.0.log file and noticed several things:
>>
>> It looks like it finds the card as PCI rather than AGP (which it is).
>> I noticed that the only thing Virtual is located near the 75% area of the
>> file. It reports "Virtual size is 640x480 (pitch 640)".
>> About the 92% area, it reports that the DRI is disabled because it needs

a
>> Voodoo3 (which XFree86 detected earlier).
>>
>> This log file also reflected the changes I had made after I sent the

first
>> email. I added ViewPort 0 0 and FbBpp 32 in the "Display" section with

24
>> bit.
>>
>> I don't know what to say, really - since I am pretty new at this 4.0.x
>> thing, but I have included my XF86Config and my XFree86.0.log files in
>> case you need them.
>>
>> Thanks alot.
>>
>
> I don't see anything particularly wrong with the XF86Config
>you posted. Are you sure that's the one being used? The
>log file says it's using /etc/X11/XF86Config. If you're sure
>about that, somebody with a 3dfx card should try to verify the
>problem. Virtual sizes are recognized which the nvidia driver
>so it's not a core XFree86 problem.
>
>
> Mark.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xpert mailing list
>
>http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
>