Ask PLUG: best OS for wireless applications

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: AlanDayleyadayley@adtron.com
Date:  
Subject: Ask PLUG: best OS for wireless applications
Actually, Win2000 is WAY more stable than any of the other WinOSes thus
far. I had to put it on my computer here at work to do some driver
development. Except for the fact that it is still a bloated, "one size
must fit all" pig, it is far better than it's M$ predecessors.

Now, about embedding it? I would not want that project!

Alan

At 11:25 PM 3/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Am 29. Mar, 2001 schwäzte Alan Dayley so:
>
>> Troll!
>
>I don't think he's a troll, but he should've given info as to why it's
>good for embedded wireless. Based on their general "bigger is better"
>model of OSen I'd think it'd really suck for embedded. I'm told, however,
>their desktop stuff actually works and it doesn't crash. Maybe they stole
>OS !X from macntoy....
>
>> At 02:15 PM 3/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
>> >
>> >Windows 2000.
>
>--
># home.pages.de/~lufthans/

www.YourCompanyHere.net ;-)
># A t-shirt a day keeps the noose (tie) away. - der.hans


/------------------------------------------
|Alan Dayley             www.adtron.com
|Software Engineer       602-735-0300 x331
|
|
|Adtron Corporation         
|3710 E. University Drive, Suite 5
|Phoenix, AZ  85034
\-------------------------------------------