Ask PLUG: best OS for wireless applications

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: DavidMandalaDavid.Mandala@DevelopOnline.com
Date:  
Subject: Ask PLUG: best OS for wireless applications
I'm partial to the Lucent Wave LAN Gold Card (gold = 128bit encryption,
silver = 56bit) The Compaq Wireless card works with the Lucent but the Linux
drivers don't work yet, actually I believe that they will work I just need
to add the hardware info so the card is recognized as an 802.11b card. It
gives all indications that it will work. The Linux PCMCIA drivers see the
card but no driver is loaded, I can however query the PCMCIA slot and read
the card info.

Davidm

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn T. Rutledge [mailto:ecloud@bigfoot.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:26 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Ask PLUG: best OS for wireless applications
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:15:38PM -0700, David Mandala wrote:
> > I'd say that I am quite biased but Linux of course. I run wireless
> > networking at home and it works great. Several friends who
> have iPaq's drop
> > over and use their wireless cards with no problems
> so.......... Linux has
> > great support for wireless networking of all types both
> 802.11 and amateur
>
> Which 802.11 cards work best? What do you think of the alternatives -
> Bluetooth and Proxim Symphony? (I have a few of the latter to play
> with...)
>
> -- 
>   _______                   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  
> 
>  (_  | |_)          http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud  
> 
>  __) | | 
> \________________________________________________________________

>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your
> mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to
> write mail.
>
> Plug-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>