do you use cox@home?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: BrianCluffbrian@snaptek.com
Date:  
Subject: do you use cox@home?
Hmmm, somewhere between the cox universe and that one there must be a very
crappy hop. Looks like if thats one of the main sites you are trying to get
to that cox might not be the way to go.

I'l try and remember to do another set of pings in a day or 2 and see if
maybe there is a path that is down and its having to go around the long way
to get there.

Brian Cluff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Armand" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: do you use cox@home?


> >From Prescott Valley by way of AT&T dial up account:
>
> offspring:/home/bucky# ping -c 5 mume.pvv.org
> PING fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=0 ttl=225 time=369.3 ms
> 64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=1 ttl=225 time=409.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=2 ttl=225 time=360.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=3 ttl=225 time=410.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=4 ttl=225 time=360.0 ms
>
> --- fire.pvv.org ping statistics ---
> 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 360.0/381.8/410.1 ms
>
>
> offspring:/home/bucky# ping -c 5 www.hartinger.ws
> PING hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=0 ttl=240 time=229.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=229.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=230.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=230.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=230.0 ms
>
> --- hartinger.ws ping statistics ---
> 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 229.1/229.8/230.0 ms
>
>
> offspring:/home/bucky# traceroute mume.pvv.org
> traceroute to fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221), 30 hops max, 38 byte
> packets
> 1 165.238.67.72 (165.238.67.72) 136.824 ms 129.544 ms 130.045 ms
> 2 1.phoenix-16-17rs.az.dial-access.att.net (12.72.38.1) 128.960 ms
> 119.459 ms 129.389 ms
> 3 165.238.127.21 (165.238.127.21) 149.934 ms 139.866 ms 139.943 ms
> 4 gbr1-a31s4.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.127.12.181) 140.044 ms 149.568 ms
> 130.108 ms
> 5 gbr3-p70.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.1.173) 139.943 ms 148.581 ms
> 141.068 ms
> 6 ggr1-p360.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.123.28.129) 149.934 ms 139.862 ms
> 139.928 ms
> 7 att-gw.la.teleglobe.net (192.205.32.222) 149.943 ms 149.619 ms
> 129.982 ms
> 8 if-10-0.core1.NewYork.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.101) 219.800 ms
> 219.822 ms 219.842 ms
> 9 if-0-2.core2.London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.0.189) 289.970 ms
> 283.006 ms 286.706 ms
> 10 if-4-0.core1.London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.69) 289.925 ms
> 289.854 ms 289.966 ms
> 11 if-10-0.core1.Paris.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.90) 299.899 ms
> 299.857 ms 299.938 ms
> 12 if-0-0.core1.Paris2.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.98) 299.937 ms
> 299.812 ms 299.932 ms
> 13 if-8-0.core1.Frankfurt2.Teleglobe.net (195.219.15.206) 309.946 ms
> 299.840 ms 299.952 ms
> 14 if-1-0.core2.Stockholm.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.18) 339.907 ms
> 329.833 ms 329.946 ms
> 15 e-gw.teleglobe.net (195.219.88.194) 339.932 ms 329.786 ms 329.925
> ms
> 16 no-gw.nordu.net (193.10.68.30) 330.089 ms 341.425 ms 339.947 ms
> 17 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (193.10.68.50) 339.922 ms 339.847 ms 339.945
> ms
> 18 trd-gw.uninett.no (128.39.0.250) 349.941 ms 349.794 ms 349.944 ms
> 19 ntnu-gw2.ntnu.no (158.38.0.222) 350.056 ms 339.922 ms 329.880 ms
> 20 sb-gw.ntnu.no (129.241.76.130) 340.039 ms 350.366 ms 340.072 ms
> 21 fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221) 339.780 ms 349.623 ms 340.133 ms
>
>
> offspring:/home/bucky# traceroute www.hartinger.ws
> traceroute to hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
> 1 165.238.67.72 (165.238.67.72) 126.499 ms 129.568 ms 129.882 ms
> 2 1.phoenix-16-17rs.az.dial-access.att.net (12.72.38.1) 129.887 ms
> 119.619 ms 129.928 ms
> 3 165.238.127.21 (165.238.127.21) 149.899 ms 139.746 ms 139.369 ms
> 4 gbr1-a31s4.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.127.12.181) 145.841 ms 139.767 ms
> 129.615 ms
> 5 gbr3-p70.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.1.173) 129.887 ms 139.753 ms
> 129.967 ms
> 6 ggr1-p360.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.123.28.129) 149.889 ms 139.833 ms
> 139.964 ms
> 7 att-gw.la.sprint.net (192.205.32.186) 140.525 ms 149.460 ms
> 139.908 ms
> 8 sl-bb20-ana-15-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.178) 149.946 ms 148.622
> ms 140.916 ms
> 9 sl-bb20-sj-5-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.18.182) 149.929 ms 139.568
> ms 159.851 ms
> 10 sl-bb22-rly-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.217) 209.891 ms 199.837
> ms 199.922 ms
> 11 sl-gw8-rly-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.7.246) 209.928 ms 209.627
> ms 219.932 ms
> 12 sl-pairnet-1-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.190.142) 219.933 ms
> 219.851 ms 209.938 ms
> 13 * * *
> 14 hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40) 219.928 ms 216.805 ms 221.375 ms
>
> HTH,
>
> Armand
>
>
> Armin Hartinger wrote:
> >
> > Hello plug-discuss,
> >
> > Cox@Home is finally available in my area and I wanted to know how
> > the latency of it is. If you use Cox, plz reply to me with ping and
> > traceroute results to
> >
> > mume.pvv.org
> > www.hartinger.ws
> >
> > Thanks in advance and sorry for the trouble!
> >
> >   --
> > Best regards,
> >  Armin                          mailto:armin@pctechware.com

>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't

post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> Plug-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss