do you use cox@home?

HOLY CRAP!!! what is that first one??? a satellite connection???? Thats
the only thing that I have ever seen that gets ping times that bad
consistently.

Brian Cluff

Here's the results you requested....

[brian@napita brian]$ ping mume.pvv.org
PING fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=0 ttl=234 time=1023.3 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=1 ttl=234 time=1004.9 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=2 ttl=234 time=1025.9 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=3 ttl=234 time=1029.0 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=4 ttl=234 time=1028.8 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=5 ttl=234 time=1012.7 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=6 ttl=234 time=986.7 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=7 ttl=234 time=990.2 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=8 ttl=234 time=977.6 ms
64 bytes from 129.241.210.221: icmp_seq=9 ttl=234 time=972.1 ms

--- fire.pvv.org ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 9% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 972.1/1005.1/1029.0 ms

[brian@napita brian]$ traceroute mume.pvv.org
traceroute to fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 10.78.66.1 (10.78.66.1) 29.801 ms 11.537 ms 11.744 ms
2 10.0.211.101 (10.0.211.101) 9.366 ms 9.491 ms 7.848 ms
3 c1-pos4-0.phnxaz1.home.net (24.7.74.165) 10.241 ms 9.807 ms 17.538 ms
4 c1-pos2-0.sndgca1.home.net (24.7.65.134) 17.133 ms 19.215 ms 21.267
ms
5 c1-pos1-0.anhmca1.home.net (24.7.64.69) 35.926 ms 19.326 ms 19.646 ms
6 c1-pos1-0.snjsca1.home.net (24.7.65.165) 27.266 ms 29.523 ms 29.291
ms
7 bb2-pos1-0.paix.nap.home.net (24.7.74.170) 33.439 ms 28.273 ms 36.427
ms
8 if-5-0-0.bb1.PaloAlto.Teleglobe.net (207.45.200.237) 33.872 ms 35.300
ms 34.242 ms
9 if-4-4.core1.PaloAlto.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.182) 32.944 ms 30.681
ms 32.870 ms
10 if-10-2.core1.NewYork.Teleglobe.net (207.45.223.113) 870.407 ms
871.847 ms 872.617 ms
11 if-0-2.core2.London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.0.189) 969.904 ms 980.170
ms 976.510 ms
12 if-4-0.core1.London.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.69) 984.181 ms 944.150
ms 985.544 ms
13 if-10-0.core1.Paris.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.90) 983.789 ms 987.358
ms 984.855 ms
14 if-0-0.core1.Paris2.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.98) 982.097 ms 978.870
ms 969.814 ms
15 if-8-0.core1.Frankfurt2.Teleglobe.net (195.219.15.206) 951.896 ms
972.951 ms 983.204 ms
16 if-1-0.core2.Stockholm.Teleglobe.net (195.219.96.18) 973.866 ms
965.133 ms 970.816 ms
17 e-gw.teleglobe.net (195.219.88.194) 981.265 ms 1005.779 ms 996.720 ms
18 no-gw.nordu.net (193.10.68.30) 991.819 ms 994.053 ms 993.540 ms
19 oslo-gw1.uninett.no (193.10.68.50) 981.310 ms 982.912 ms 975.810 ms
20 trd-gw.uninett.no (128.39.0.250) 990.599 ms 953.033 ms 976.929 ms
21 ntnu-gw2.ntnu.no (158.38.0.222) 974.284 ms 979.009 ms 969.459 ms
22 sb-gw.ntnu.no (129.241.76.130) 968.486 ms 958.726 ms 986.337 ms
23 fire.pvv.org (129.241.210.221) 982.919 ms 1013.688 ms 1005.341 ms


[brian@napita brian]$ ping www.hartinger.ws
PING hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=92.3 ms
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=105.1 ms
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=80.1 ms
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=86.3 ms
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=81.7 ms
64 bytes from 216.92.236.40: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=78.7 ms

--- hartinger.ws ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 78.7/87.3/105.1 ms

[brian@napita brian]$ traceroute www.hartinger.ws
traceroute to hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 10.78.66.1 (10.78.66.1) 11.707 ms 13.187 ms 20.599 ms
2 10.0.211.101 (10.0.211.101) 9.366 ms 18.407 ms 9.200 ms
3 c1-pos4-0.phnxaz1.home.net (24.7.74.165) 9.868 ms 37.868 ms 8.634 ms
4 c1-pos9-0.lamstx1.home.net (24.7.65.129) 27.654 ms 24.600 ms 76.134
ms
5 c1-pos7-0.dllstx1.home.net (24.7.65.126) 35.404 ms 32.548 ms 54.959
ms
6 24.7.70.214 (24.7.70.214) 46.644 ms 30.885 ms 88.347 ms
7 138.at-6-0-0.XR2.DFW9.ALTER.NET (152.63.100.214) 30.530 ms 34.874 ms
47.464 ms
8 0.so-3-0-0.TR2.DFW9.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.81) 40.808 ms 58.599 ms
59.708 ms
9 128.at-7-3-0.TR2.DCA8.ALTER.NET (146.188.141.149) 72.664 ms 72.560 ms
74.972 ms
10 196.ATM6-0.XR2.DCA1.ALTER.NET (152.63.32.173) 80.892 ms 73.269 ms
72.303 ms
11 194.ATM6-0.GW3.PIT1.ALTER.NET (152.63.36.253) 79.483 ms 85.830 ms
84.040 ms
12 pair-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.48.162) 96.107 ms 80.379 ms
83.961 ms
13 192.168.1.5 (192.168.1.5) 78.561 ms 96.450 ms 81.819 ms
14 hartinger.ws (216.92.236.40) 84.346 ms 79.273 ms 84.155 ms

----- Original Message -----
From: "Armin Hartinger" <armin@pctechware.com>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: do you use cox@home?


> Hello plug-discuss,
>
> Cox@Home is finally available in my area and I wanted to know how
> the latency of it is. If you use Cox, plz reply to me with ping and
> traceroute results to
>
> mume.pvv.org
> www.hartinger.ws
>
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the trouble!
>

>   --
> Best regards,
>  Armin                          mailto:armin@pctechware.com

>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss