vi in hell mode, was RE: NSI... moving a domain

If I just could get a class browser in my vi
I would be totally sold.

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Nathan Saper [mailto:natedog@well.com]
-> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:24 AM
-> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
-> Subject: Re: vi in hell mode, was RE: NSI... moving a domain
-> 
-> 
-> As someone on comp.editors said, "I like VIM because, when I 
-> ask a question
-> in [comp.editors], I get a one-line answer.  With xemacs, I 
-> get a 1Kb lisp
-> script with bugs in it. ;-)"
-> 
-> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:44:42AM -0700, sinck@ugive.com wrote:
-> > 
-> > \_ I still fumble around in vi - apparently the days of 
-> line editors have
-> > \_ finally escaped me. I think I probably couldn't use 
-> edlin anymore or
-> > \_ whatever that attrocious thing was that I used on VAX. 
-> Give me emacs  ;-)
-> > \_ 
-> > \_ With that, I'm clocking out and I'll leave the editor 
-> wars to everyone else.
-> > 
-> > Sancho!  My Sword!  My Armor!
-> > 
-> > [Yes! Your Grace.]
-> > 
-> > Oh, um, sorry.  Every now and again, I fire up vi after saying
-> > term=unknown.  Keeps me competent for when things get 
-> really bad.  :-)
-> 
-> Good idea.  That's one of the nicest things about vi: it 
-> ALWAYS works.
-> 
-> > On the flip side, emacs rules.  I've coded hooks so that 
-> when I commit
-> > a CGI file (either via CVS or RCS) it a) commits b) throws 
-> a http log
-> > message, and c) logs the update to my personal work 
-> history database.
-> > Beat that with a stick.
-> 
-> The same could be accomplished by writing some shell scripts 
-> and using "map"
-> and "au" commands in vim.  And with vim, you don't have to 
-> learn a whole new
-> language just to get things working.
-> 
-> "Emacs is a nice OS - but it lacks a good text editor.  
-> That's why I am
-> using Vim."
-> 
-> I think that sums it up.  Emacs tries to be an entire OS.  
-> It suffers from
-> the same disease that Microsoft does: Let's add as many 
-> features as we can,
-> so we can have one program that does everything!  If I want 
-> to read my mail,
-> I'll use a MUA; if I want to browse the web, I'll use a web 
-> browser.  I
-> don't need to do everything from within my text editor.
-> 
-> Having said that, I think the editor war is fairly silly.  I 
-> have my reasons for
-> using vi, you have your reasons for using Emacs.  What text 
-> editor to use is
-> a personal choice.
-> 
-> -- 
-> [ Nathan Saper (natedog@well.com)  
-> http://www.well.com/user/natedog/ ]
-> [ GPG: 0x6D7A0DA0 ADB6 C720 B46B AE39 93BD E598 897E D87D 
-> 6D7A 0DA0  ]
-> [ PGP: 0x386C4B91 E6 65 BB E2 31 08 36 BF 0C 87 91 B8 26 AE 
-> 5E 5A    ]
-> 
-> ________________________________________________
-> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your 
-> mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape 
-> to write mail.
-> 
-> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
-> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-> 

"The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any
virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message
and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By
reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
arising in any way from this message or its attachments."