[OT] -- Fry's and other retailers - kls

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: CIE-Keithkeith@christianexchange.org
Date:  
Subject: [OT] -- Fry's and other retailers - kls
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Cluff <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] -- Fry's and other retailers - kls


> > How does this "profit from fines work"? Fines are set in court

and go
> > to that jurisdiction. I know of no court that shares fines.

Arizona
> > Revised Statuses do require restitution if that is what you are
> > talking about, however there would be no profit in restitution.
>
> I don't remember exactly how it works, but california has a similar

law. I
> think that Tower Records would fine the people directly about $250

to $1000
> and that it was somehow enforceable under some law. Someone once

told me
> that it was a way for tower to gain back some of the money that the

theif
> cost them. Basicly they assume that the person had successfully

stolen from
> tower in the past. Usually that was true, and they just nail them

for some
> amount they guess they had stolen in the past.



This will never happen. It is unconstitutional. There is a due
process requirement under the law. I can not fine you for stealing
from me. In Arizona I can request restitution or the judge can order
it. Actually, I think the law makes restitution in a theft case
automatic. This would amount to : someone steals a music CD worth
$12.00 they are caught and the product is turned over to the police as
evidence. The police use finger printing powder that stains the CD
case. The CD goes into the property room or is photographed and
returned to the shop that it was stolen from. The CD is damaged. The
judge orders $12.00 in restitution. If the CD is returned in it's
original condition and is returned to the display for sale, no
restitution is made. I don't see how there is a profit here.

I've never looked at theft prevention as a profit center. The only
way that would work is, for example, you loose $2Mil a year. You hire
3 people that cost you $250,000 a year total. They prevent or recover
$500,000 the first year. Your losses are now 1.5Mil + $250,000. You
have a gain of $250,000.

Keith


>     I dont know how much truth there as in that, I do know that we

had
> sevral parties that were throw out of the loss prevention budget

from the
> recouped money they got, so they were definatly getting it. I wish

I had
> actually found out exactly what laws they were working under.
>
> I do need to be more clear though... The loss prevention dept. made

money
> over what it costs to employ them. That is NOT adjusted to

compensate for
> the amout of items that go missing over the year... It's just shows

that
> their undercover dudes that are in the store all the time are very
> effective... thats it.
>
> Brian Cluff
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail

doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> Plug-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss