On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:36:56AM -0700,
sinck@ugive.com wrote:
> <SPARK TYPE=HOLYWAR>
> Ah, the cry of someone who has never used emacs to code a hook into
> emacs' version control suite, auto submitted that change to a daily
> log, and auto email the result to a administrator.
>
> Do that in Mutt, if you can. :-)
>
> I've done it in emacs.
> </SPARK>
Yeah, that was one hell of a spark. ;-)
I couldn't use Emacs for mail, because then I'd have to use Emacs as my text
editor. And that would be unacceptable.
> You'll never ever convince me that Mutt is *more* powerful than emacs
> without a long pitched battle first, and perhaps not even then. You
> might convince me Mutt *approaches* emacs in vanilla configuration
> without much of an argument tho.
I concede that Emacs is damn powerful. I used it as my text editor (and
even my mail client) for a little while. But, for me, Emacs's power is
outweighed by vi's simplicity and ease-of-use.
> Not to start more holywars than necessary, I'll admit to actually
> having used :map in vi on purpose and had it do what I wanted it to.
Yeah, :map works pretty well for most purposes.
--
[ Nathan Saper (natedog@well.com) http://www.well.com/user/natedog/ ]
[ GPG: 0x6D7A0DA0 ADB6 C720 B46B AE39 93BD E598 897E D87D 6D7A 0DA0 ]
[ PGP: 0x386C4B91 E6 65 BB E2 31 08 36 BF 0C 87 91 B8 26 AE 5E 5A ]
(text/plain)