fetchmail & mutt

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 05:18:53PM -0700, Michael J. Schweppe wrote:
> Is the fetchmail+mutt combo reasonable or am I biting too much off?

Fetchmail and mutt are most often used together. I don't think you're
biting too much off at all.

> Perhaps there is anther mail program to better fit my needs?

I doubt it. Mutt is the most versatile, most powerful mail agent in
existence.

One thing to consider, however: Mutt does not have built-in support for
sending mail via smarthosts. This means that you will have to configure an
MTA on your local machine if this is how you send mail. (This is how most
ISPs are set up). Some mail agents, such as Pine, have built-in support for
smarthosts.

If you use Debian, setting up exim is a trivial matter. Just run
"eximconfig" as root.

-- 
[ Nathan Saper (natedog@well.com)  http://www.well.com/user/natedog/ ]
[ GPG: 0x6D7A0DA0 ADB6 C720 B46B AE39 93BD E598 897E D87D 6D7A 0DA0  ]
[ PGP: 0x386C4B91 E6 65 BB E2 31 08 36 BF 0C 87 91 B8 26 AE 5E 5A    ]

From Eden Li" <Eden.Li@asu.edu Wed Jan 10 03:01:16 2001
From: Eden Li" <Eden.Li@asu.edu (Eden Li)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:01:16 -0700
Subject: fetchmail & mutt
References: <3A5BAA6D.ADD9B8F2@schweppe.org>
Message-ID: <012501c07ab1$bba078b0$d6862040@tumor>

What better way to get your feet wet? IMO, mutt+fetchmail+procmail is the
best combo for mail on Linux or *BSD. http://www.mutt.org/ for more info.
(Sorta funny considering I'm using outlook right now :)

Eden

From: "Michael J. Schweppe" <michael@schweppe.org>
| Greetings All:
|
| As I'm starting to become Linux dependent, [hey, I got my printer and
| palm working too with some special help] I was considering setting up
| fetchmail+mutt. After NS trashed my mail filters I figured I have
| nothing to lose.
|
| I'm admittedly ignorant in these realms. Is the fetchmail+mutt combo
| reasonable or am I biting too much off?
|
| Perhaps there is anther mail program to better fit my needs?