>Yeah. If you want a rock solid stable OS, you shouldn't be living on
>the bleeding edge. Generally, the best thing to do when there are
>major changes like this (kernel, compiler, libraries, etc.) is to let
>other folks be the guinea pigs. Right now for Red Hat, that means you
>should continue to run 6.2 with patches and let other folks find the
>problems in Red Hat 7. But most of you know all of this already; .0
>releases of anything are generally less stable than the ones that
>follow.
This almost sounds like a Win2k deployment strategy :)
Lucas
(text/plain)