On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:24:37PM -0700, Jason wrote:
>
> Has anyone else had their phoneline RAPED recently by Qwest?
>
> These cocksuckers recently took away my busy signal, and replaced it
> with a voice that demands I either hang up, or press a number to be
> charged 75 cents so that they will redial the busy number
> automatically.
>
> Does this strike anyone else as slightly insane? Most phones these
> days, like modems, come with an automatic redial option. Of course,
> after the cocksuckers at quest BREAK the existing phones by removing
> the busy signal WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION, they sort of have a monopoly on
> redial.
>
> Fuckers!
>
> I called them up to demand they change it back, and they say the need
> to speak to the person who is in charge of the phone bill. Funny
> thing, the cons sure as fuck didnt need to speak to anyone when they
> fucked the phoneline up to start with, did they?
>
> Ahhh... local decentralization cant come soon enough. I would like to
> put a bullet thru the head of the asshole who came up with the idea to
> replace the busy signal with advertizements for a useless service.
>
I would agree. This is seriously pissing me off. All it does is make
it harder for me to connect to my Fidonet boss. Is there anybody out
there who actually uses this "feature"?
- --
Nathan Saper (natedog@well.com) | http://www.well.com/user/natedog/
GnuPG/PGP5: 0x9AD0F382 | PGP2 (RSA): 0x386C4B91
Standard PGP & PGP/MIME OK | AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu
(text/plain)