ldconfig definitely chokes...
it won't allow under any circumstances it seems.
Jason wrote:
> Hawke wrote:
> > Well guys,
> > I am having a problem with Mesa and the other libs
> > associated with this. a lot of them demand glibc-2.2.x
> > but redhat doesn't have that version.
> >
> > When I try to upgrade to that version from rufus.w3.org
> > I suddenly get a lot of failed dependencies with other
> > more important system tools (like pam, perl, xauth, and others).
> >
> > I really wish redhat would either get with the program, or
> > make a standard that everyone can live with!
>
> Have you tried having more than one glibc installed.. or does ldconfig
> choke on that?
>
> I noticed that I have glibc-1.2.so.0.0.6 ... Mesa 3.0 compiled fine.
> Maybe thats why "glut.h" is missing... maybe I need a newer Mesa too
> (I downloaded it quite a while ago)
>
> --
> jkenner@mindspring.com __
> I Support Linux: _> _ _ |_ _ _ _|
> Working Together To <__(_||_)| )| `(_|(_)(_|
> To Build A Better Future. | <s>
(text/plain)