WRT security, you may want to consider avoiding
cvs pserver.
On the WinCVS web site there's a HOWTO on getting
command line NT ssh working with WinCVS.
Kevin is correct. ssh (with compression) is
great for remote CVS stuff.
Mi N$2,
D
* On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:03:57AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Aug 1, 10:53pm, David Demland wrote:
>
> > I am trying to prove that we can use CVS instead of VSS by
> > MicroSaft. I have a GUI client for WindBlose but I can not get it
> > to connect to the CVS server on my Linux box. The documentation
> > says that it needs port 2401, this seems to be empty but every time
> > I try to connect to the port there is a failure. I do not know how
> > to fix this. Does anyone have an idea?
>
> As Rod mentioned, I think you'll need to set up inetd.conf to
> invoke "cvs pserver". See the section entitled "Setting up the
> server for password authentication".
>
> With regard to CVS vs VSS, I can tell you that when I worked for
> Metrowerks, we used VSS for our source code control during the first
> couple of years that I was there. It was a nightmare. It was totally
> unusable for remote employees and it was extremely slow and unreliable
> for even the local people (in Austin). Metrowerks had developed (and
> was shipping) a Mac client which worked with a VSS server, so they had
> a considerable in investment in making it work, if at all possible.
>
> After reviewing a number of options, the company eventually switched
> to CVS. CVS is not without its problems, but it is much faster and
> much more reliable than VSS. From my perspective (being a remote
> employee), the really good thing about it is that it allow remote
> employees with fast, secure (via ssh) access to the company's source
> code repository.
>
> Kevin
(text/plain)