On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Furmanek, Greg wrote:
> Since I missed the Monday discussion Here is my 2 cents.
>
> I have seen a lot of people advocating Perl. I have seen some
> posts recommending Python and some people still like c/c++ combo.
>
> I've had the pleasure to program in all of the languages and they all
> have their good and bad sides. They all have their best usage.
>
> Please Remember these are my opinions:
>
[snip]
>
> 3. C++:
> Great overall language.
> Compilabe (major plus in my view)
Just a reminder, Python programs CAN be compiled into executables using
the "freeze" script that (I believe) comes with Python. Freeze takes a
Python program, bundles it together with a small-as-possible Python
installation, and shoots out C code, which is then compiled into an
executable. Pros: Allows for installation on computers without Python
installed, and allows for source code to be hidden (if that's your thing),
and it's faster. Cons: Executable is platform dependant, and the
executable is fairly large (I've never gotten one that was below 1 mb).
> Great for system programming
> Great for installation on systems without compiler (binary
> distribution)
> Great performance. (sometimes needs tweaking)
> Great OOP
> Love the syntax.
> Very capable.
>
[snip]
>
> The Wolf
>
>
>
> -> -----Original Message-----
> -> From: Don Harrop [mailto:don@nis4u.com]
> -> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 12:40 PM
> -> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> -> Subject: to code or not to code?
> ->
> ->
> -> I was wondering if I could get some feedback on some
> -> scripting / programming
> -> languages to jump into for a newbie coder. Perl seems like
> -> a good choice
> -> because everybody has it and there's tons of support. You
> -> can either use it
> -> for web page development or linux admin stuff. I don't know
> -> if you can
> -> compile it to a single exacutable under DOS/WIN stuff
> -> though. That would be
> -> cool. I've listened to a few people on the list talk about
> -> python and it
> -> sounds good but it doesn't seem to have the same amount of
> -> support as Perl
> -> does. C++ would be cool but I don't want to have to compile
> -> everything
> -> before I can run it. It might be overkill for a newbie.
> -> :-) Links on
> -> where to go to learn the code would be nice too...
> ->
> -> Don
> ->
> ->
> -> _______________________________________________
> -> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> -> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> ->
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
--
Nathan Saper
natedog@well.com
nsaper@sprintpcs.com (cell phone)
http://www.well.com/user/natedog/