Converting over to RPM

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Barnett, Blake
Date:  
Subject: Converting over to RPM
You may want to find out what the rpm is looking for, it may be looking for
files based on the redhat directory structure. (ie. /lib/library.so =
/usr/lib/library.so) and some linking would take care of it.. Otherwise, I
think editing the rpm database would also be defeating the purpose.

Or perhaps a better question to ask is what the differences in directory
structure are between redhat and slackware? Is using rpms going to be more
pain than it's worth? Maybe dpkg would work smoother with slackware.
Homework time I guess.

Maybe rpm should use ./configure.. *snicker*

* Blake


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Rosinski [mailto:rick@rickrosinski.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:32 PM
To: PLUG
Subject: Converting over to RPM


Now that I have had my fun with tarballs, ./configure, make , make install
ever since I started using Linux (back in 1997), I want to move over to RPM
to save some time and frustration with management of libs, etc. So, I began

with Glade. The first dependency that the install failed was ld-linux.so.2.

I ran the locate command (slackware), and found that it was in the /lib
directory. I don't want to have to download all of the required rpms and
install them if most of them may be on my system already. Of course, I
could
always do rpm --force <rpm pkg>. This would defeat the purpose of using
rpms
in the first place. What would be the best way to go about editing the rpm
database so that it knows what files are where (for those files that I do
already have?). Is there a utility that does this? Do I have to do it
manually (if I do, how?).

Thanks in advance. Rick R.


--
Rick Rosinski
http://rickrosinski.com


_______________________________________________
Plug-discuss mailing list -
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss