Holy War: RE: Package management vs. ./configure

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: KeithSmith
Date:  
Subject: Holy War: RE: Package management vs. ./configure
I can see I'm not alone!


Craig White wrote:
>
> I know that there is no free lunch here regardless.
>
> Along with my futility in setting up the UPS monitoring...
>
> I tried installing openssh-2.2.0 from the tarball from openssh.org - says
> that I needed openssl-0.9.5a (and of course I was using an older version). I
> downloaded the 0.9.5a from openssl.org and installed it and still openssl
> says that it wasn't installed. So then in my desparation to get the UPS
> system going, I found an rpm for openssh2 on contrib.redhat.com and
> installed the rpm - still won't work ARGH!!!!
>
> I don't mind using tarballs but when one tarball depends on another tarball
> and the first one doesn't put the files where the second one expects them to
> be - it's all a bit too painful.
>
> I guess I'm just venting because I know I'll get it worked out but it takes
> too much time...the benefit is, I learn more about each package using
> tarballs and reading thru the source code but I don't want to be an expert
> on every tarball that I install.
>
> The argument for package management is obvious but all the various distro's
> put things in different places and for obvious reasons - when it comes to
> redhat - they can't distribute openssl/openssh and it's a complete pia.
>
> I don't mind ./configure but I just wish that ./configure were a bit more
> intelligent about the various distro's sometimes.
>
> Craig
>
> ----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|
> - Craig White - PO Box 8634 - Scottsdale, Arizona - 85252
> - e-mail address ................ -
> - world wide web address ........ - http://www.AzApple.com
> - e-mail my pager address ....... -
> - cellular phone ................ - (602) 377-9752
> - voice/facsimile ............... - (480) 945-8445
> ----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Shawn
> > T. Rutledge
> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 10:24 AM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: Holy War: RE: Package management vs. ./configure
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:43:21AM -0700, Jim wrote:
> > > As far as ease-of-installation goes, HelixCode wins hands down.
> > Not only does
> > > it install all of the selected Gnome packages that you request,
> > it finds,
> > > downloads, and installs all the dependent packages. What could
> > be easier?
> >
> > Well I'd be really reluctant to use it on a system that has other kinds
> > of package management, because it would get it confused wouldn't it?
> > Maybe on a Slackware system.
> >
> > --
> >   _______                   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  
> >  (_  | |_)          http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud  
> >  __) | | \________________________________________________________________
> > Get money for spare CPU cycles at http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=5903

> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plug-discuss mailing list -
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


--
Jesus is Lord!,
Keith Smith
520.298.2227
------------------------------
Come see what's new at:
http://www.christian-home.net/