Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 9:18am, KeithSmith wrote:
>
> > > What kind of suggestions were you looking for?
> > >
> >
> > I think I was fishing. I like the idea of getting
> > OpenSSH for free however is it better than SSH
> > that one has to pay for?
>
> You can still get SSH1 for free (gratis). SSH2 you have to pay for.
> The company marketing SSH2 has also made it difficult to find SSH1
> and the maintainance of SSH1 hasn't been very good.
>
> > Which is better?
>
> I don't know since I only have experience with SSH1.
>
> I think OpenSSH is the way to go though since it is truly free (both
> as in beer and as in liberty). Also, I've read that OpenSSH now
> supports protocol 2, so I see few reasons to prefer SSH2 over OpenSSH.
>
> The only reasons that I can think of to prefer SSH2 over OpenSSH is if
> you want support that you have to pay for or if you want the secure
> ftp facility that comes with SSH2. OTOH, you should know that scp
> (secure copy) has been around for much longer and has always worked
> well for me.
>
> You may want to look at http://www.openssh.com/goals.html for more
> info.
>
> Kevin
Thank you for all this information and your
input. It will go to good use.
Keith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)