Gnome PGP and Kmail

On Sat, 27 May 2000, der.hans wrote:

> Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 02:12:17 -0700 (MST)
> From: der.hans <PLUGd@LuftHans.com>
> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: Gnome PGP and Kmail
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2000, Nathan Saper wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > What's this June meeting I keep hearing so much about? Is PLUG having a
> > key-signing party or something?
>
> That's part of the presentation. 08Jun at the Boys and Girls Club. The
> talk will be GPG and we'll do key signing. Depending on time we'll get the
> short intro of ssh or the reader's digest version of the short intro :).
>
> Have you done key-signing parties before? If so, you wanna post about
> experiences and suggestions for how to make it run smoothly?

Sorry, haven't had any personal experience with key-signing parties
before. However, I know people that have done them, and from what I've
heard it's easiest if people post their public keys on keyservers and
bring private keys on floppies (unless everyone has his or her own
computer to bring). That way, everyone's public key is downloaded from
the keyserver and people take turns signing each one. When the day is
done, the keys are uploaded back to the keyserver.

Keep in mind, I'm sure there are better ways of running key-signing
parties than this.

- -Nathan

>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> # der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.OpNIX.com
> # You can't handle the source! - der.hans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

- --

Primary Email (PGP): natedog@well.com
Alternate Email (no PGP): nsaper420@yahoo.com
PGP Key: http://www.well.com/user/natedog/key.pgp
http://www.well.com/user/natedog/