dual network cards

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: JoelDudleyjoel@silverw.com
Date:  
Subject: dual network cards
The cards are pci and I do have the aliases set up. I found out that
linksys has the new driver, I just dont know how the heck to install it. It
is tulip.c from their site.

- Joel
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Buettner <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: dual network cards


> On Apr 12, 5:14pm, Joel Dudley wrote:
>
> > A newbie at my wits end!! Here is what I did. I installed red hat

with
> > the server option, thus I have no X. I put two Linksys NICs into the
> > system, but red hat setup did not detect them and set them up. I know

they
> > use tulip.o which is located in my /lib/modules/kernelversion/net
> > directory. I tried to use linuxconfig from the CL, but to no avail. I

even
> > tried appending lilo.conf after doing a cat /proc/pci to get the IRQ

and IO
> > of the cards. What is the easiest way for one to install network cards

from
> > the CLI when setup does not detect them???? I also tried adding my owng
> > ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth1 to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory

but
> > still no good. Ahhh at least it is good that I have been humbled by

this
> > problem. Thanks in advance.
>
> Are they PCI cards or ISA cards?
>
> Anyway, it sounds to me that you need some entries for these cards in
> conf.modules. Something along the lines of
>
> alias eth0 tulip
> alias eth1 tulip
>
> (If you're really sure that they use the tulip driver that is... have
> you checked the Ethernet HOWTO?)
>
> You may also need some options lines for configuring the irq etc, but
> I'd leave these out until you are certain that you really need them.
>
> If they are PCI cards, I believe the cards are detected in bus order.
> This'll determine which is eth0 and eth1. If they're ISA cards, I
> think the order of detection is driver dependent. With the old 3c509
> cards that I used to use, I think the one with the lowest ethernet
> address was eth0 and the other was eth1.
>
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin Buettner
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list -
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss