win2k 65k errors

I read somewhere that for 'optimum performance' 128M is recommended

John

|-----Original Message-----
|From: D. Taylor [mailto:dtaylor@www.dssolutions.com]
|Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 1:24 PM
|To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
|Subject: Re: win2k 65k errors
|
|
|
|I would check the slashdot archives.
|
|My concern as a company would be "what percentage
|of our PeeCees have the CPU/RAM/disk to even
|THINK about running W2K?"
|
|If y'all haven't done it yet, read the copy on the
|back of a W2K box at Fry's or CompUSA.
|
|Also, check the requirements: 32M RAM minimum.
|Heh.
|
|D
|
|On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote:
|
|> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:04:07
|> From: Rooster <meinnetz@techmerc.dhs.org>
|> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
|> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
|> Subject: win2k 65k errors
|>
|> does anyone still have the link to the article about the
|65,000 errors with
|> winblows 2k? was discussing upgrade possibilities with
|someone at motorola
|> and would like to have that with me to prevent conversion to
|that system.
|> told them enough to make them nervous, but would like the
|print to fully
|> kill the idea.
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
|> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
|>
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
|http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
|