It seems like on Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 11:56:52AM -0700, Joel Dudley scribbled:
Orig Msg> Received: from snappy.wiredglobal.com (root@localhost)
Orig Msg> by mail.magusnet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA32395
Orig Msg> for <frenchie@magusnet.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:00:03 -0700
Orig Msg> Received: from ([208.247.17.228]) by teergrube (10 sec delayed, relaying denied)
Orig Msg> Received: from snappy.wiredglobal.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Orig Msg> by snappy.wiredglobal.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA10440;
Orig Msg> Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:58:32 -0700
Orig Msg> Received: from ntweb01.silverw.com ([204.245.4.21])
Orig Msg> by snappy.wiredglobal.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA10416
Orig Msg> for <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:58:30 -0700
Orig Msg> Received: from wshiwrlinx ([204.245.4.13]) by ntweb01.silverw.com
Orig Msg> (Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-63834U300L100S0V35)
Orig Msg> with SMTP id com for <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>;
Orig Msg> Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:01:06 -0700
Orig Msg> Message-ID: <000801bf821d$938c9670$0d04f5cc@silverw.com>
Orig Msg> From: joel@silverw.com (Joel Dudley)
Orig Msg> To: <plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
Orig Msg> Subject: SPAM
Orig Msg> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:56:52 -0700
Orig Msg> MIME-Version: 1.0
Orig Msg> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
Orig Msg> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF81E2.E7124730"
Orig Msg> X-Priority: 3
Orig Msg> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Orig Msg> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Orig Msg> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Orig Msg> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Orig Msg> Sender: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Orig Msg> Errors-To: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Orig Msg> X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Orig Msg> Precedence: bulk
Orig Msg> List-Id: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss.lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us>
Orig Msg> X-BeenThere: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Orig Msg> I have a question about good ol' spam. We had this spammer come in and decimate our NT mail server (dont worry I am setting up Qmail on redhat as I type). Anyway we know who he is and where he lives (California). Now I was wondering how we go about prosecuting this guy. I know that California has anti-spam laws I am just not sure if I contect authorities and they follow up, or does our company have to lead the attack? Anyone have experience with this? Thanks in advance.
Orig Msg>
Orig Msg> - Joel Dudley
Save your logs.
Contact:
Gail Thackeray
Assitant Attorney General
(602) 542-4266
Make sure they get the cell with the
guy with all rotten teeth and a c*!k
like a 2-liter pepsi bottle.
Jean Francois Sends...
President & CEO MagusNet, Inc.
MagusNet.com
CTO EBIZ Enterprises, Inc.
TheLinuxStore.com,TheLinuxLab.com,LinuxWired.net
(text/plain)