PFA: home computers have no "reasonable expectation of privacy"

der.hans PLUGd at LuftHans.com
Mon Jul 11 22:30:26 MST 2016


Am 10. Jul, 2016 schwätzte Tom Roche so:

moin moin,

privacy is overrated, we should just mandate making all home walls out of
glass.

Maybe it's time to notch up the desktop security series to be a desktop
hardening series.

ciao,

der.hans

> Apologies to those who've already seen this, but it was news to me:
>
> Last month (Jun 2016), federal district judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr[1] ruled that the Fourth Amendment[2] does not protect home computers. A criminal defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding an in-home personal computer, and the federal government does not need a warrant to hack one.[3] Particularly, "a computer afforded Fourth Amendment protection in other circumstances is not protected from Government actors who take advantage of an easily broken system"[4] to implant malware. The full decision is in this scanned PDF[5].
>
> Gotta start hardening, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
>
> [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Coke_Morgan,_Jr.
> [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
> [3]: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/06/federal-court-fourth-amendment-does-not-protect-your-home-computer
> [4]: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/fbis-use-of-tor-exploit-is-like-peering-through-broken-blinds/
> [5]: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

-- 
#  http://www.LuftHans.com/        http://www.PhxLinux.org/
# "MacGyver himself off Mars." -- pretty well every geek who
#  has read "The Martian"


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list